Download
A properly designed website should be usable, accessible, fast, and consistent. At a minimum, it should help visitors find what they need quickly, work well on mobile, and follow web standards for HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, along with accessibility guidelines like WCAG.
Core standards
· Valid, semantic code: clean HTML, CSS, and JavaScript that browsers can interpret reliably.
· Accessibility: keyboard navigation, alt text, good color contrast, proper headings, and form labels.
· Responsive design: layouts that adapt well to phones, tablets, and desktops.
· Performance: fast loading pages and optimized assets.
· Clear structure: consistent navigation, visual hierarchy, and obvious calls to action.
Good UX signs
· Users can understand the site quickly without much explanation.
· Important information is easy to find.
· The design is visually consistent across pages.
· Content is readable, concise, and relevant.
· Contact or next-step actions are easy to locate.
Practical checklist
· Use one clear primary purpose per page.
· Keep navigation simple and predictable.
· Make buttons and links obvious.
· Test on mobile and multiple browsers.
· Check accessibility with tools like Axe or WAVE.
· Include SEO basics like page titles, meta descriptions, and descriptive URLs.
Use this rubric to score a website from 1 to 5 in each category, where 1 = poor and 5 = excellent. A strong website should score at least 4 in the most important categories: usability, accessibility, mobile responsiveness, and performance.
Category | 1 | 3 | 5 |
Purpose and clarity | Unclear purpose, confusing messaging | Main purpose is somewhat clear | Purpose is immediately obvious, messaging is focused |
Navigation | Hard to find pages, inconsistent menu | Usable but not always intuitive | Simple, predictable, and easy to scan |
Visual design | Cluttered, inconsistent, or outdated | Acceptable but uneven | Clean, balanced, consistent, and professional |
Responsiveness | Breaks or looks bad on mobile | Works on most screens with minor issues | Adapts smoothly to all common screen sizes |
Accessibility | Missing basics like alt text or labels | Partial accessibility support | Keyboard-friendly, well-labeled, good contrast, semantic structure |
Performance | Slow loading, heavy pages | Moderately fast but not optimized | Fast, optimized, and efficient |
Content quality | Hard to read or too much filler | Useful but not polished | Clear, concise, relevant, and easy to scan |
Calls to action | No clear next step | CTAs exist but are weak | CTAs are obvious and well placed |
Trust and credibility | Looks untrustworthy or incomplete | Some trust signals present | Strong credibility cues: contact info, policies, proof, consistency |
SEO basics | Missing titles/descriptions or poor structure | Some SEO basics in place | Good page titles, meta descriptions, headings, and clean URLs |
Scoring guide
· 45–50: Excellent, production-ready.
· 35–44: Good, but needs refinement.
· 25–34: Average, with important issues to fix.
· Below 25: Weak, major redesign needed.
Download